	Personen	Treffen/Publikationen	Fotografien	Intern
jusla-31: Gießen 2023 jusla-30: Jena 2022 jusla-29: Bochum 2021 JuSla-Online-Kaffeepause 2020 jusla-28: Hamburg 2019 jusla-27: Heidelberg 2018 jusla-26: Bamberg 2017 jusla-25: Göttingen 2016 jusla-24: Köln 2015 jusla-23: Dresden 2014 jusla-22: München 2013 jusla-21: Göttingen 2012 jusla-20: Würzburg 2011 jusla-19: Berlin 2010 jusla-18: Regensburg 2009 jusla-17: Frankfurt am Main 2008 jusla-16: Dresden 2007 jusla-15: Bochum 2006 jusla-14: Stuttgart 2005 jusla-13: Leipzig 2004 jusla-12: Gießen 2003 jusla-11: Cambridge 2002 jusla-10: Berlin 2001 Vorwort Tanja Anstatt Horst Dippong Ursula Doleschal und Edgar Hoffmann Uwe Junghanns Holger Kuße Anke Levin-Steinmann Imke Mendoza Roland Meyer Andreas Späth Katrin Unrath-Scharpenack jusla-9: Halle/Wittenberg 2000 jusla-8: München 1999 jusla-7: Tübingen/Blaubeuren 1998 jusla-6: Wien 1997 jusla-5: Bautzen 1996 jusla-4: Frankfurt am Main 1995 jusla-3: Hamburg 1994 jusla-2: Leipzig 1993 jusla-1: Wien 1992
Sie sind hier: Homepage → Treffen → jusla-10 → jusla-Junghanns Ferne Objekte Uwe Junghanns The present paper deals with noun phrases (DPs) in complex structures that appear clause-initially but seem to be connected in one way or other to the position of the embedded object. The initial set of data comprises examples of the German Long Passive and the Turkish Infinitival Double Passive that have received analyses involving restructuring and successive short movements, respectively. It is an empirically and theoretically challenging task to establish whether Slavic languages also allow what can be called “distant objects” and to clarify the motivation and syntactic nature of this phenomenon. Russian was chosen as the object language to be investigated. Out of the seven types of constructions that have been included in the investigation, two are ungrammatical – (i) Long Passive (type A) and (ii) Double SJA (type D). The following types represent well-formed structures: (iii) Preposed Embedded Objects (type B), (iv) the Double Passive (type C), (v) Control into an unaccusative embedding (type E), (vi) Raising out of an unaccusative embedding (type F), and (vii) Structures that contain an infinitival purpose clause with a non-overt operator (type G). The well-formed structures differ with respect to the base position of the moved DP. The DP originates either in the embedding (types B, C, and F) or the matrix (types E and G). In either case, the DP moves in successive steps to occupy the topic position of the clause. Thus, movement by the DP is crucially motivated by requirements of information structuring. The resulting structures are economical in that syntactic options are used which are generally available (movement in successive steps, co-indexation mechanisms, chain formation, non-overt categories). In all cases, movement results in chains with the topicalized DP at the head and a trace in the base position of the embedded object at the foot. Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. X. JungslavistInnen-Treffen Berlin 2001. Hg. Robert Hammel und Ljudmila Geist. München: Sagner 2003 (= Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 139), 101–123.

Ferne Objekte

Uwe Junghanns

The present paper deals with noun phrases (DPs) in complex structures that appear clause-initially but seem to be connected in one way or other to the position of the embedded object. The initial set of data comprises examples of the German Long Passive and the Turkish Infinitival Double Passive that have received analyses involving restructuring and successive short movements, respectively.

It is an empirically and theoretically challenging task to establish whether Slavic languages also allow what can be called “distant objects” and to clarify the motivation and syntactic nature of this phenomenon. Russian was chosen as the object language to be investigated.

Out of the seven types of constructions that have been included in the investigation, two are ungrammatical – (i) Long Passive (type A) and (ii) Double SJA (type D). The following types represent well-formed structures: (iii) Preposed Embedded Objects (type B), (iv) the Double Passive (type C), (v) Control into an unaccusative embedding (type E), (vi) Raising out of an unaccusative embedding (type F), and (vii) Structures that contain an infinitival purpose clause with a non-overt operator (type G).

The well-formed structures differ with respect to the base position of the moved DP. The DP originates either in the embedding (types B, C, and F) or the matrix (types E and G). In either case, the DP moves in successive steps to occupy the topic position of the clause. Thus, movement by the DP is crucially motivated by requirements of information structuring. The resulting structures are economical in that syntactic options are used which are generally available (movement in successive steps, co-indexation mechanisms, chain formation, non-overt categories). In all cases, movement results in chains with the topicalized DP at the head and a trace in the base position of the embedded object at the foot.

Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. X. JungslavistInnen-Treffen Berlin 2001. Hg. Robert Hammel und Ljudmila Geist. München: Sagner 2003 (= Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 139), 101–123.