	Personen	Treffen/Publikationen	Fotografien	Intern
jusla-31: Gießen 2023 jusla-30: Jena 2022 jusla-29: Bochum 2021 JuSla-Online-Kaffeepause 2020 jusla-28: Hamburg 2019 jusla-27: Heidelberg 2018 jusla-26: Bamberg 2017 jusla-25: Göttingen 2016 jusla-24: Köln 2015 jusla-23: Dresden 2014 jusla-22: München 2013 jusla-21: Göttingen 2012 jusla-20: Würzburg 2011 jusla-19: Berlin 2010 jusla-18: Regensburg 2009 jusla-17: Frankfurt am Main 2008 jusla-16: Dresden 2007 jusla-15: Bochum 2006 jusla-14: Stuttgart 2005 Vorwort Tanja Anstatt Natalia Brüggemann Ursula Doleschal Ljudmila Geist Edgar Hoffmann Beatrix Kreß Holger Kuße Grit Mehlhorn Barbara Sonnenhauser Andreas Späth Luka Szucsich Karin Tafel jusla-13: Leipzig 2004 jusla-12: Gießen 2003 jusla-11: Cambridge 2002 jusla-10: Berlin 2001 jusla-9: Halle/Wittenberg 2000 jusla-8: München 1999 jusla-7: Tübingen/Blaubeuren 1998 jusla-6: Wien 1997 jusla-5: Bautzen 1996 jusla-4: Frankfurt am Main 1995 jusla-3: Hamburg 1994 jusla-2: Leipzig 1993 jusla-1: Wien 1992
Sie sind hier: Homepage → Treffen → jusla-14 → jusla-Szucsich Die (Ohn)Macht zur Veränderung: (Morpho)Syntaktische Eigenschaften von Präfixen in slavischen Sprachen Luka Szucsich In the present paper, I examine different types of prefixes in Slavic languages. One group of prefixes apparently influences event structure itself. They add resultative meaning by providing a specification of the resultant state which is often (at least historically) spatial, but synchronically no longer decomposable, i.e. idiosyncratic. Those prefixes may have effects on the argument structure of the derivationally modified verb. Added to simplex transitive and unergative verbs, they make the internal argument obligatory. Sometimes in those contexts they alter sortal restrictions concerning the internal argument. In recent literature, those prefixes are often called lexical or internal prefixes. Within a non-lexicalist derivational syntactic theory, the data suggest an analysis where those prefixes are generated in the complement domain of the verbal lexical root (the category V). The second group of prefixes, so-called superlexical or external prefixes, have aspectual/phasal and quantificational meanings. They do not directly influence the event structure by making internal arguments obligatory or changing selectional restrictions. However, this group of prefixes is quite heterogeneous with respect to alleged common properties like the compatibility with time span adverbials, the ability to form secondary imperfectives, and the aspectual type of input they attach to. Nonetheless, the mentioned differences to lexical prefixes–the fact that lexical prefixes appear closer to the verbal root if co-occurring with superlexical prefixes, and the fact that superlexical but not lexical prefixes may be multiply inserted–suggest that superlexical prefixes are generated above the verbal root category (possibly as non-phrasal adjuncts). Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XIV. JungslavistInnen-Treffen Stuttgart 2005. Hg. Ljudmila Geist und Grit Mehlhorn. München: Sagner 2008 (= Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 150), 177–196.

Die (Ohn)Macht zur Veränderung: (Morpho)Syntaktische Eigenschaften von Präfixen in slavischen Sprachen

Luka Szucsich

In the present paper, I examine different types of prefixes in Slavic languages. One group of prefixes apparently influences event structure itself. They add resultative meaning by providing a specification of the resultant state which is often (at least historically) spatial, but synchronically no longer decomposable, i.e. idiosyncratic. Those prefixes may have effects on the argument structure of the derivationally modified verb. Added to simplex transitive and unergative verbs, they make the internal argument obligatory. Sometimes in those contexts they alter sortal restrictions concerning the internal argument. In recent literature, those prefixes are often called lexical or internal prefixes. Within a non-lexicalist derivational syntactic theory, the data suggest an analysis where those prefixes are generated in the complement domain of the verbal lexical root (the category V).

The second group of prefixes, so-called superlexical or external prefixes, have aspectual/phasal and quantificational meanings. They do not directly influence the event structure by making internal arguments obligatory or changing selectional restrictions. However, this group of prefixes is quite heterogeneous with respect to alleged common properties like the compatibility with time span adverbials, the ability to form secondary imperfectives, and the aspectual type of input they attach to. Nonetheless, the mentioned differences to lexical prefixes–the fact that lexical prefixes appear closer to the verbal root if co-occurring with superlexical prefixes, and the fact that superlexical but not lexical prefixes may be multiply inserted–suggest that superlexical prefixes are generated above the verbal root category (possibly as non-phrasal adjuncts).

Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XIV. JungslavistInnen-Treffen Stuttgart 2005. Hg. Ljudmila Geist und Grit Mehlhorn. München: Sagner 2008 (= Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 150), 177–196.