	Personen	Treffen/Publikationen	Fotografien	Intern
jusla-31: Gießen 2023 jusla-30: Jena 2022 jusla-29: Bochum 2021 JuSla-Online-Kaffeepause 2020 jusla-28: Hamburg 2019 jusla-27: Heidelberg 2018 jusla-26: Bamberg 2017 jusla-25: Göttingen 2016 jusla-24: Köln 2015 jusla-23: Dresden 2014 jusla-22: München 2013 jusla-21: Göttingen 2012 jusla-20: Würzburg 2011 jusla-19: Berlin 2010 jusla-18: Regensburg 2009 jusla-17: Frankfurt am Main 2008 jusla-16: Dresden 2007 jusla-15: Bochum 2006 jusla-14: Stuttgart 2005 Vorwort Tanja Anstatt Natalia Brüggemann Ursula Doleschal Ljudmila Geist Edgar Hoffmann Beatrix Kreß Holger Kuße Grit Mehlhorn Barbara Sonnenhauser Andreas Späth Luka Szucsich Karin Tafel jusla-13: Leipzig 2004 jusla-12: Gießen 2003 jusla-11: Cambridge 2002 jusla-10: Berlin 2001 jusla-9: Halle/Wittenberg 2000 jusla-8: München 1999 jusla-7: Tübingen/Blaubeuren 1998 jusla-6: Wien 1997 jusla-5: Bautzen 1996 jusla-4: Frankfurt am Main 1995 jusla-3: Hamburg 1994 jusla-2: Leipzig 1993 jusla-1: Wien 1992
Sie sind hier: Homepage → Treffen → jusla-14 → jusla-Sonnenhauser Definitheit und Spezifizität verbaler Prädikate Barbara Sonnenhauser Both nominal and verbal expressions can be used to refer. The referent of a verbal predicate corresponds to the topic time interval I(TT). Internal structure and boundedness characteristics of I(TT) and their relationship to the standpoint of the observer, the točka otsčeta TO, determine specificity and definiteness of this verbal referent. The specification of I(TT) is achieved by grammatical aspect which establishes a relation between the event time interval I(e) and I(TT). In certain cases, aspect selects particular elements encoded in the semantic representation of the verb/VP, namely phases (j) and boundaries (t). In other cases, aspect relates the whole I(e) to I(TT). I(TT) is projected onto the temporal axis of the speaker via TO. With the selection function, I(TT) is unambiguously anchored to TO, with the simple relation function, it is merely quantified over. In the former case I(TT) is specific, in the latter non-specific. The boundedness-feature of I(TT) determines its definiteness: a closed I(TT) is salient and thus definite, an open I(TT) is non-salient and thus indefinite. Bulgarian has grammatical means to specify both internal structure (pf/ipf) and boundedness (Aorist/Imperfect) of I(TT). This proposal is an attempt to account for the referents and the referential mechanisms of verbal predicates. Regarding grammatical aspect as crucial in this respect sheds new light onto its interpretation and its discourse behaviour. Moreover, this proposal captures parallels between the nominal and verbal domains without ignoring the decisive difference: reference to discourse participants vs. reference to intervals. Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XIV. JungslavistInnen-Treffen Stuttgart 2005. Hg. Ljudmila Geist und Grit Mehlhorn. München: Sagner 2008 (= Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 150), 146–162.

Definitheit und Spezifizität verbaler Prädikate

Barbara Sonnenhauser

Both nominal and verbal expressions can be used to refer. The referent of a verbal predicate corresponds to the topic time interval I(TT). Internal structure and boundedness characteristics of I(TT) and their relationship to the standpoint of the observer, the točka otsčeta TO, determine specificity and definiteness of this verbal referent. The specification of I(TT) is achieved by grammatical aspect which establishes a relation between the event time interval I(e) and I(TT). In certain cases, aspect selects particular elements encoded in the semantic representation of the verb/VP, namely phases (j) and boundaries (t). In other cases, aspect relates the whole I(e) to I(TT). I(TT) is projected onto the temporal axis of the speaker via TO. With the selection function, I(TT) is unambiguously anchored to TO, with the simple relation function, it is merely quantified over. In the former case I(TT) is specific, in the latter non-specific. The boundedness-feature of I(TT) determines its definiteness: a closed I(TT) is salient and thus definite, an open I(TT) is non-salient and thus indefinite. Bulgarian has grammatical means to specify both internal structure (pf/ipf) and boundedness (Aorist/Imperfect) of I(TT).

This proposal is an attempt to account for the referents and the referential mechanisms of verbal predicates. Regarding grammatical aspect as crucial in this respect sheds new light onto its interpretation and its discourse behaviour. Moreover, this proposal captures parallels between the nominal and verbal domains without ignoring the decisive difference: reference to discourse participants vs. reference to intervals.

Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XIV. JungslavistInnen-Treffen Stuttgart 2005. Hg. Ljudmila Geist und Grit Mehlhorn. München: Sagner 2008 (= Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 150), 146–162.